← All posts

Playbook · July 21, 2026 · 2 min read

The First Two Lines Are the Whole Post

LinkedIn truncates everything after the first lines behind 'see more.' How to write openings that earn the click without baiting it.

On LinkedIn, readers see roughly your first two lines and a …see more link. That fold is the most important design constraint on the platform, and most writers ignore it. Whatever your post is about, its job splits cleanly in two: the opening exists to earn the expansion, and the rest exists to deserve it.

What actually earns the click

Openings that work tend to do one of a few things:

What kills the click

The same failures appear everywhere: openings that summarize ("Some thoughts on hiring"), openings that throat-clear ("I've been thinking a lot lately about…"), and openings that give away the ending so there's nothing left to expand. If your first line could be the last line, the post is upside down.

The line between a hook and bait

Curiosity gaps become clickbait the moment the payoff can't cash the check the opening wrote. The test is simple: after reading the whole post, would a reader feel the opening was fair? Bait spends trust; hooks invest it. You can only spend an audience's trust a few times before the see more stops getting clicked at all — and expansion behavior is exactly the kind of signal ranking systems watch.

A practical drill

Write the post first, however it comes out. Then delete your first paragraph and look at what's now on top — it's usually stronger, because most writers warm up on the page. Finally, draft three candidate first lines and pick the one that creates a question. This takes four minutes and routinely doubles how far people read.

Your best sentence should never be below the fold. Nobody down there has committed to you yet.